Ghosts of Hanley House
Feature film · 85 min · dir. Louise Sherrill
- Horror
- Thriller
Synopsis
Five people are spending the night in a haunted house. Things get dicey when some of them start turning up decapitated.
Synopsis from TMDb
Details
- Director
- Louise Sherrill
- Writer
- Louise Sherrill
- Composer
- David C. Parsons
- Cinematography
- Claude Fullerton
- Studio
- Victoria Productions
- Released
- 1968-01-01
- Running time
- 85 minutes
Cast & crew
- Louise Sherrill Director
- Elsie Baker
- Barbara Chase
- Roberta Reeves
- Wilkie de Martel
- Cliff Scott
- Leonard Shoemaker
- Carl Grzybowski
- Rubye Holmes
Reviews on the Internet Archive
★★★★★ · Excellent and Suspenseful Horror · hushicho · 2014-03-17
This film won't be for everyone, but I found it to be extremely effective in building tension and being eerie and unsettling. I was frankly a bit frightened at some parts, and I felt that the film did an excellent job of keeping me in its grip of mystery throughout. Aside from a very few elements I felt might have been more effective if done differently, I think this is one of the best and most undeservedly overlooked films that I've ever seen. Certainly the acting isn't all stellar by everyone involved, but it's solid enough and especially considering the small cast are enough to carry the…
★★★★★ · A really spooky haunted house movie · realitypixel · 2011-05-01
Because it is a low budget film, it does have a few technical problems, mostly poor audio. In spite of this I give this film my approval because it has a genuinely spooky atmosphere both visually and in regard to the synthesizer sound effects used. This film is actually pretty creepy toward the end. There are some elements of this film that are similar to elements in Evil Dead II such as: trails in the woods changing, clocks behaving oddly, creative use of smoke, a spooky cellar, spirit communication and a few others. I hope others enjoys it.
★★★ · Where is MST3k when you need them????? · I_h8_screen_names · 2013-10-19
This not nearly as bad as most low budget films. It has an actual plot. The actors, even though they are grade D-, do try to giveit their all. The sound and the camera work are atrocious, though. It will do.
★★ · What a stinker - but I watched it. · jonfrum · 2010-10-21
This is a hard one for me to review, if only because I"m of two minds about it. The directing is terrible. People stare into the lens - or just off-lens - for what seems like an eternity, and for no obvious reason. The sound doesn't always sync up with the scenes, and it's hard to figure whether some of the sounds you hear are soundtrack background or something the actors are supposed to be hearing. The 'night' scenes are difficult to make out, and many of the cuts don't line up scenes properly. And it's not like this is a 'so-bad-that-it's-good type movie - it's played too straight for that…
★★ · Bound for cult-classicdom · Chez_When · 2012-09-11
The ending was disappointing..Really bad. Up to that point was kind of interesting. Reminded me of an early Dan Curtis/Dark Shadows type film. Too bad the writers didn't put more thought into the production especially the ending. Horror movie lovers might appreciate it.









